
Approach Overall Project: Selecting the Optimal Development Approach
PMBOK v8 Definition
The development approach defines how the project will be managed and executed. Three commonly used approaches are predictive, adaptive, and hybrid, viewed as a spectrum from predictive on one end to adaptive on the other. A predictive approach may be optimal when the project scope can be stabilized early in the project, while adaptive approaches may be helpful to manage risk and uncertainty.
Why It Matters for the Exam
This concept appears frequently in situational questions where you must determine which development approach is best for a given project scenario. Questions test your ability to match project characteristics (scope stability, risk level, regulatory requirements) with the appropriate approach from the predictive-adaptive spectrum.
Key Points to Remember (for the exam)
-
Predictive Approach (Waterfall/Plan-Driven): Optimal when scope can be stabilized early; suitable for large projects with significant investment or regulatory oversight; scope, schedule, cost, resource needs, quality requirements, and risks are well defined in early phases and remain stable.
-
Adaptive Approach: More optimal when scope is less stable; helps manage risk and uncertainty; the less stable the scope, the more optimal an adaptive approach becomes.
-
Incremental Delivery in Predictive Approaches: When overall scope is well understood but phased delivery offers advantages due to size, complexity, or specific risk factors. Project is divided into phases or increments, each delivering part of the overall product.
-
Increments Build Progressively: Each increment builds upon the previous one, adding features and functionality; increments may be sequential or overlap; stakeholder value is realized earlier through partial delivery.
-
Key Decision Factors for Approach Selection: Scope stability (less stable → adaptive), ease of change (difficult/costly changes → predictive), delivery options (components or progressive elaboration), risk (adaptive helps manage uncertainty), safety requirements (rigorous safety → predictive for up-front planning).
-
Hybrid Approach: Falls between predictive and adaptive on the spectrum; combines elements of both approaches.
-
Development Phase vs. Development Approach: The development phase is a specific stage within the project life cycle where creation and testing of deliverables occurs; the development approach defines how the project will be managed and executed.
Typical PMI Exam Example
A pharmaceutical company must develop a new drug treatment requiring regulatory approval. The scope is well defined, safety requirements are rigorous, and changes are costly. Which development approach is optimal? Answer: Predictive approach, because rigorous safety requirements need significant up-front planning to ensure compliance.
PMI Exam Traps
-
Trap: Assuming "incremental delivery" always means an adaptive approach Reality: Incremental delivery can also be used in predictive approaches when overall scope is understood but phased delivery offers advantages
-
Trap: Confusing "development approach" with "project life cycle" Reality: The development approach (predictive, adaptive, hybrid) defines how the project is managed; the project life cycle defines the phases of the project
-
Trap: Thinking predictive approaches cannot deliver partial value Reality: Predictive approaches can use increments that deliver parts of the product, realizing stakeholder value earlier through partial delivery
-
Trap: Selecting adaptive approach automatically when risk is high Reality: While adaptive helps manage risk and uncertainty, safety requirements and regulatory oversight may still mandate a predictive approach
Important PMI Connections
| Related Concept | Relationship Type | Exam Attention Point |
|---|---|---|
| Project Life Cycle | Defines phases; development approach defines management method | Distinguish between life cycle stages and approach selection |
| Delivery Cadence (Section 4.4) | Influences approach selection | Nature of deliverables and component delivery affects approach choice |
| Change Control | Predictive requires robust change control; adaptive accommodates change | Predictive = stable scope with controlled changes; Adaptive = flexible scope |
| Risk Management | Adaptive approaches help manage risk and uncertainty | Risk level is a key factor in selecting predictive vs. adaptive |
Quick Review Questions
-
A project has well-defined scope, rigorous safety requirements, and regulatory oversight. Which development approach is most appropriate?
-
When overall scope is understood but phased delivery offers advantages due to project complexity, what approach can be used while still being predictive?
-
What are the five key factors that influence the selection of a development approach?
-
True or False: Incremental delivery is only possible with adaptive approaches.
-
A project has highly unstable scope and frequent changes are expected. Which development approach is optimal according to PMBOK v8?
PMBOK v8 Reference
Section 4.2 - Development Approaches and Delivery Cadence